Poor Things
She's like nothing you've ever seen.
Brought back to life by an unorthodox scientist, a young woman runs off with a lawyer on a whirlwind adventure across the continents. Free from the prejudices of her times, she grows steadfast in her purpose to stand for equality and liberation.
Wokeness: 60%
Overall Score: 60%
Please Log in to Submit a Review!
User Submitted Reviews
Kurt Hansen
Little less nutty than it thinks it is
Poor Things is nominated for an Oscar because it's an art or film student's love child and dream. Fortunately, as it moves forward, the story isn't all that complicated that us "regular" 9-to-5 kinds of people won't be able to understand it and, actually, it's quite good.
We could live without, say, 45 minutes of over the top sex scenes, women on women, on circus freaks, men playing dress-up and the kinky stuff added in order to offend, like, Jerry Falwell. I was not offended; I got tired of the film pandering to the cause so, for that, it gets a mild woke rating.
Created: 02-13-2024
DigitalEntombment
A vacuous, feminist girl power fantasy that falls into droll idiocy
Poor Things runs the gamut of coming of age story to borderline pedophilia apologetics. While I cannot recommend watching this film, it's director Yorgos Lanthimos has done a lot with the source material. Poor Things is a film version of the same-named first book of the series that tells the story of our protagonist Bella (Emma Stone) from the prospective of Max McCandles (Ramy Youssef). Somehow the film manages to promote post-modern fifth wave feminism beliefs through anatavistic fetishism of the female body, Poor Things' cinematography for the entire film could be less charitably viewed as an exploration of The Male Gaze.
The first two acts are quite entertaining and light hearted. We slowly learn the horror of Bella's existence and origin story, the proverbial God (Willem Dafoe) and his inhuman experiments on the recently dead. In twenty minutes, Bella grows from infant to teenager, from catching a ball to catching venereal diseases. At it's core, Poor Things is a feminist power fantasy with quite a bit of character development along with a spectacular Victorian steampunk backdrop.
As Bella runs off with Duncan Wedderburn (Mark Ruffalo) to explore the greater world, the film goes into a blender of original, inspired story telling and post-modern male hating effigy burning. The line running through the second half of the film can best be summarized as: the only way a woman can find happiness and freedom in this world is by selling her body for money and be happily alone ever after. Bella is naked for about a quarter of the movie with graphic sex scenes and various sundry along the same lines. She cultivates a clinical appreciation for sexual appetites during the final act of the film, but the dissonant tone is as conflicted with reality as the texture of the scenery is absurd.
Yorgos did a fantastic job of making this degenerate drivel into a fun and entertaining film, but I cannot recommend it for casual viewing.
6.5 out of 10 anonymous johns who knock your teeth out for fun.
Created: 03-16-2024
Michaels
Weird Science
Whereas in "Weird Science" a pair of teen boys create a hot older woman (Kelly LeBrock) to be their playmate, in "Poor Things" an old mad scientist creates a hot young frankenbarbie (Emma Stone), and sets her up with his sappy assistant. Hilarity ensues. /s
Although Emma is not very young here, 33 years old, her character has the mind of a child, literally. Sex with this woman-child is pedophilia with extra steps. She is surrounded by exploitative men. Even the one "good" guy in her life takes advantage of her, though ends up a spineless simp.
So, it's not looking good on the woke front, and then the movie throws in an honorable aristocratic dapper (gay?) black man, out of place in Victorian times. Also, the film sends the message that women are free to be literal whores, because some simp will still marry them after they decide to settle down. And pegging my woke meter is interracial lesbian sex where one is mentally underaged.
Compounding the problem is the cinematography, which makes the viewer feel like a voyeur who is trying to get off by spying on all this perversion. It is pedo-ception.
On the brighter side, the movie is set in a Dystopian steampunk timeline. Still, I felt they should have infused steampunk tech in many of the everyday items, not just the transport.
To sum it up, this quirky movie posits the question: "would you commit statutory rape on a retarded Emma Stone who has the mental capacity of a child?" It throws in so much woke (pedophilia, white man bad, DEI, lesbianism) that it would be difficult for readers of this site to enjoy.
Created: 11-04-2024
