Dracula
Bloody legend.
Transylvania, 1897. The blood-drinking Count Dracula is drawing his plans against Victorian London. And be warned: the dead travel fast.
Wokeness: 100%
Overall Score: 40%
Please Log in to Submit a Review!
Cast
User Submitted Reviews
Weak argument and woke megacombo.
Starts with an atheist nun that interrogates a Dracula victim. The nun is the main protagonist, she is perfect, infalible and is a walking deus ex machina. Dracula is evil without motivation, he is just an excuse to make the protagonist shine. The story has no sense, no motivation and does not tell anything interesting. Consists of 3 chapters of more or less 90 minutes.
Chapter 1.
Perfect nun interrogates dumb lawyer that has been "draculized". She explains him what and how happened because she knows everything and never misses anything. After the interrogatory (more than a half of the chapter) Dracula comes to the church and want to enter. What for? Just to be bullyed by the supernun! Since the show must go on, Dracula makes his way in the church by making the draculized lawyer allow him to enter. Then he kills everybody except the lawyers fiance and the supernun. The supernun survives just because he just sucks some blood but does not kill him because we need the protagonist alive.
Chapter 2.
Several people on a ship. Dracula initially says that he will need 4 weeks to reach UK. Kills almost everybody in 3 days before being trapped at the UK coast the day 4. Deus ex machina as a superspeed ship in action! Of course, all men are superdumb, and the nun was on the ship half dead until she recovers magically in next scene just to confront dracula. We also have an Indian doctor with a disabled daughter. The daughter does not speak and is deaf, she is there just for inclusion policies, her only role is to unalive herself with poison. Other interesting passengers are recently married couple that travel with their black assistant... and he is the lover of... Right! The guy! (double point). He also is well dressed and educated, he even explains that he is not a servant and not a slave, dies pathetically after being fooled by Dracula.
Chapter 3.
Dracula wakes up 123 years after being "defeated" by the nun. Not the nun has a descendent that is exactly her (even the same super deus ex machina powers). After trapping him and releasing him Dracula meets a "pretty" (that is what everybody says, supposedly) girl that is "very popular" (she fucks with everybody because she is strong and independet) and will marry a noname guy that she just met cheating on her "boyfriend". Don't ask me about the logic. Even having a future husband, she meets every night with dracula and he sucks her blood, eventually transforming her in a vampire. After being incinerated, she revives because she is "undead" and goes to see Dracula for a dinner. She appears and interrupts the nun and her exboyfriend talking with dracula. Since she is desfigured, the exboyfriend kills her. Note that Dracula didn't care about her phisical appearence. Then the nun says the exboyfriend to leave and convinces Dracula to suicide. END.
Yes, it is as random as it seems. You cannot avoid to cheer for Dracula, despite being egoistic, evil and narcicist. How bad is the protagonist, the nun, if you feel more confortable with the antagonist?
Created: 06-11-2026