All User Reviews

Only someone totally inept such as Baz Luhrmann would slap a rap soundtrack on a 20s setting. Literally nobody else would do this, because it's so profoundly stupid. Is it pandering to rap fans among the millennials and zoomers, or is it pandering to the decadent black culture of the present? It could be both.

Who has been pandering to rap music since its very inception? Liberals, always. They love its decadence, non-musicality, while willfully ignoring the violence and sexism which they are allegedly totally against. Rap music was always pushed by the left, because it is the ideal soundtrack to the end of Western civilization, and a great way to virtue-signal because you're allegedly helping a "poor community" by allegedly allowing its talent to prosper. If white males had started a music which was all about boasting, machismo, crime and hoes - liberals would have thrown it deep into the underground. Placing rap music on top of a classic novel set 100 years ago is a totally leftist thing. Marxist propaganda works in various ways, it isn't just DEI and girl-bossing - as some reviewers here believe. There are at least 30 different ways in which leftism can contaminate a movie, not just two or three.

Obviously the novel itself has somewhat of a left-wing slant, because why else would Hollywood do it several times, but Luhrmann made it even more liberal.

Horrendous cast, obviously, because that is another staple of this director.

Very left-wing just like the series...

Communist fantasy, with a premise written by an amoeba...

A Czech who lived under communism makes an rebellious drama with political overtones, and yet the Left claims this film as their own, as if tyrannical oppression is exclusive to the Far Right...

Still, Forman appears to be a leftist, judging from his filmography, so who knows...

There is no clear leftist scamboogery however, it's open to interpretation...

Haven't seen it in decades so not sure how to rate it...

I disagree with 1st reviewer who seems to think that leftism "wasn't yet invented" in the 70s. Left-wingisms had existed in cinema since its beginning... Plenty of Marxist propaganda in 20th-century films...

Another piece of trash by Apatov. Political nepo baby Amy Schumer is the worst comedienne of all times, and proof that anybody can be a celebrity - provided they stem from a powerful, wealthy and influential clan. She's the stereotypical JP. Even worse: a nepo JP, and that obviously means a Marxist nepo JP as well.

Nothing redeemable about this woman, or this dumb, somewhat feminist film... Amy is so dumb she actually believes that true feminism involves behaving like a male slob. Feminazis hate men - yet want to be like them. What is that all about?... So they don't really hate men, do they, they merely suffer from penis envy...

This dumb bio is full of nepo babies and that's why it stinks...

Directed by an elitist nepo as well, Ron Howard, one of the most overrated directors of the last 50 years...

Any docu on the subject is 10 times better.

Apparently no leftist nonsense, despite nepo Ron being a communist shill...

Just started 1st episode & guess what, it's based around israel, one of the most shittiest/destruction loving country in the world.

Just another indian political conspiracy film.

Just a nonsense indian political conspiracy film.

Troll accounts need to be deleted, there are two just on this page...

This is a very obvious leftist film, anyone who rates it 0/5 is a liar...

Was David Cronenberg's movie The Brood about his various talent-free offspring that would eventually start making very bad movies?

You gotta love it when a privileged, elitist l, nepo baby JP (Zappa fans will understand this) starts virtue-signaling Marxist nonsense, and very primitively. David's daughter is a shill and has no skills...

Possibly Kubrick's worst movie.

Firstly, because he didn't seem to have a penchant for comedy, the only genre he failed at.

Secondly, because the satire is based on bullshit rather than truth. Portraying the US military and government as a bunch of nuclear-happy lunatics didn't make sense to me even when I was a teenager, hence I never found it funny. For comedy to work it needs to be based in some kind of reality that makes sense, especially satire. You can't satirize something that isn't there.

If he had made equal fun of the Soviets that would have improved things, certainly because it would have included an element of reality. But even then it would have been a stupid film. Not to mention unfunny.

The threat of nuclear war was real, but Kubrick back then was still a misinformed Jewish man who believed leftist propaganda. He would later change his politics, because he was too intelligent to remain a leftist, and certainly not immoral enough to stay a leftist. Despite the fact that this would have helped his career, in a Hollywood that was becoming increasingly Marxist.

It is very ironic that these same liberals that he trusted back in the 60s would be the ruin of him in the 90s, when they completely destroyed the final version of Eyes Wide Shut: the version that came out was not Kubrick's. What very few people know is that this movie was about pedophilia and cults, and that was too close to comfort for Hollywood elites, even back then in the late 90s. According to very reliable inside sources, and you can find this stuff on YouTube, he screamed his ass off at Warner Brothers executives for destroying his film. If that film confuses you know that it's not his fault: Hollywood's mafia destroyed it by taking out some key scenes, or by not allowing him to complete the shoot...

Anyway, if you are a fan of cheesy comedy and you are an incorrigible Marxist, this is the film for you...