Woke r' Not

All User Reviews

Discover what our community thinks about the latest movies and TV shows. Browse honest reviews covering both wokeness levels and overall quality ratings.

Showing 373 to 384 of 4434 reviews

Wokeness 0/5
Not Woke Very Woke
Overall 3/5
Poor Excellent

Faithful to the original story

A solid continuation of the original saga, staying true to all the relationships and characters without forcing anything in, and keeping the same logic it always had; one in which there has always been a diverse group of characters from all over Aang’s world, as he recruited them and learned from them.

Excellent.

Score: 4

Comments (0)

Please log in to comment.

Created: 04-26-2026

Noneyo Bidness
Wokeness 5/5
Not Woke Very Woke
Overall 0/5
Poor Excellent

100% pure, unfiltered, democrat propaganda.

Everything that is "good" in the movie aligns with being woke and following all the liberal BS. Everything that is "bad" in the movie aligns with being a "right winger". Everything in the movie that is "poor" and "underdog" associated with the Dems. Everything in the movie that is "disgustingly rich" and "an asshole" aligns with "right wingers". The "strong male figure" who plays the lead is a bumbling idiot "just trying to do the moral thing" dispite his inability to control his emotional anger. (Representing the average male democrat in their eyes.)

There are references to:
"cops killing unarmed black men for looking at them the wrong way"; "killing someone because you disagree with them is justified"; "illegal imigrants"; "having a lot of kids is equal to hell"; the dumb country bumpkins are trying to kill the hero who just wants "everything that the left stands for" and to "help his family" <--(the latter of which leftists don't statistically have thereby installing a false image of the left); "if you don't agree with the message, you're a counter revolutionary who is worthless"; "all cops are crooked"; "Che Guevara"; "anarchy"; "you can be arrested just for having the truth in your house"; "mothers are the best friend to daughters, so who needs fathers?"; "turning a cross upside down"; "electrocuting and setting fire to cops is fine"; "capitalism is evil"; "all republicans worship the government"; "burn down the establishment"; The symbol for the "network" is a swasticka (ironic considering all the mainstream networks in the real world are owned by leftists); the hero is justified for saying "Stop filming me in public"

Alternatively, there are aspects of:
- big tech being evil
- the government being evil
- the housing situation in the U.S. being an absolute joke
- being anti-survailence state
- police needing better training
- the mainstream media being fake (even though it's ironic that a peice of complete democrat propaganda is promoting that being that the democrats own almost all mainstream media)

...which I mostly agree with. I'm not a republican or a democrat, but if you use your brain to think for yourself this movie wasn't made for you. This is not even in the spirit of the original Running Man. Remakes like this where they are replacing all of the media that they don't agree with, with media of the same name that fits their narrative so the younger generations are brainwashed in to believing what they want them to believe, should terrify you. This is a shallow attempt at rewriting history in from the eyes of insane democrats. It's not surprising it was filmed in the U.K. and Canada...

Movie Rating - 1/10
Woke rating - 9.5/10 (EXTREMELY WOKE.)

Score: 2

Comments (0)

Please log in to comment.

Created: 04-25-2026

Wokeness 5/5
Not Woke Very Woke
Overall 1/5
Poor Excellent

Completely designed to push the message

The main character is a girl who, right from the start, loses her parents and ends up in orphanages (which they don’t even bother explaining). By the time she’s just 13, she’s made so many mistakes that they transfer her like she’s some adult criminal, until she ends up in a detention center where they supposedly “need her.” And somehow she has this extrasensory sense to figure out that they only want her there so they can hit some political quota and make the place look good. Then, with a whole ghetto attitude, she goes off on the directors and basically anyone she runs into.

There isn’t a single male character until one finally shows up, “Raúl,” who used to be “Ramona.” lol! I mean, you can’t get more woke than that! And the only white character that shows up is a grumpy white guy who I’m pretty sure is the antagonist.

I lasted 22 minutes watching this trash. Total waste of time.

Score: 6

Comments (0)

Please log in to comment.

Created: 04-25-2026

suppressed_in_europe
Wokeness 5/5
Not Woke Very Woke
Overall 2/5
Poor Excellent

10 Minutes in and you already know you wasted 11

Ex wife helps out ex Husband after he got out after a BS charge and is now working as a PI by letting him stay in the Gardenhouse but only after he speaks to her new Wife.... a lesbo Boss Bitch... stopped watching after that....


could have had promise as a down on his luck PI shtick... but yeah lets tell men they are second class in the first 10 Minutes...

Score: 3

Comments (1)

Please log in to comment.

@kurt-662 • 6 months ago
That is where I stopped as well. I read the book and his ex-wife is married to a man and she has an affair with Decker. Obviously, that is a major departure from the book her and done for DEI reasons.

Created: 04-24-2026

Wokeness 0/5
Not Woke Very Woke
Overall 4/5
Poor Excellent

Not woke, just very good

The film is contemplative and philosophical. If there is a “lesson” to be learnt, it concerns the beauty of the present moment, not some social imperative. There is no ‘villain’ representing a system. Just a good movie !

Score: 1

Comments (0)

Please log in to comment.

Created: 04-24-2026

Wokeness 0/5
Not Woke Very Woke
Overall 3/5
Poor Excellent

Nothing woke in this one. The first half was pretty good despite some minor complaints but the second half really brings the entire thing
down a notch. Some great acting and performances all around. While I wouldn't call this horror but more thriller there is some very creepy
and unsettling scenes. The plot is a resident at a nursing home terrorizes other residents. One of the biggest plot issues is it's set in modern world yet there is not one single camera anywhere to be found and not one person has a cell phone or ever gets visitors from a family member. This guy manages to move about freely terrorizing residents and making tons of noise and there is never a single nurse or orderly ever anywhere. Loud disruptive scenes play out in the middle of the day in a common room and again nobody ever shows up to check. Several highly suspicious deaths that are clearly foul play and no investigation or questions are asked. It all becomes so impossible and ridiculous by the end that it ruins what could of been a nice little thriller that also takes a look at nursing homes, aging and onset dementia. Most of these problems could of been fixed by simply setting it in a different decade like the 70's or even the 80's. Still might be worth a 1 time watch as the acting is very good.

Score: 1

Comments (0)

Please log in to comment.

Created: 04-23-2026

Wokeness 1/5
Not Woke Very Woke
Overall 3/5
Poor Excellent

There was a character named "Jamie." I'm going to guess that's a she, since her voice is female (kind of strong, but female enough). The main problems/confusions about her were not fully male or female hair style + face. And she told the main character "Grey" to not ask her "gender," which is good; better to stay in the dark than know that painful information. She was in the movie for a few minutes anyway.
Otherwise, I liked the robotic body and camera movements when the STEM was in control. And it's a good thing they didn't go for a "good ending."

Score: 2

Comments (0)

Please log in to comment.

Created: 04-23-2026

Wokeness 2/5
Not Woke Very Woke
Overall 1/5
Poor Excellent

I'm actually shocked this has a sequel. The first was a low budget disaster movie that bombed at the theater so 6 years later the triple the budget and try again. Really? For the positives the FX at least look pretty good in this one and the acting is decent. However the writing is so incompetently bad this has to have been an A.I script, nobody can write something this utterly stupid on purpose. Woke aspects are too much DEI casting choices and obvious pushing the women better than men b.s.

Spoilers for the first 40 minutes.....

So to start it's only been 5 years and they are already opening up the bunker for outside excursions. One of these missions is the father going out alone on a gathering mission. He was specifically selected because he's a structural engineer and can assist in rebuilding. Why would you be risking sending him out on something like that. He goes out in a full EVO suit then just casually
takes his gear off and exposes himself to the environment only to go back for a decontamination wash as soon as he's back inside. We then go back in the bunker to the group of decision makers and leaders. There are a lot of DEI casting choices on display in general throughout the bunker and the movie itself. The leadership council is made up of men and women however the men mostly just sit there silently while the females talk and make decisions with the lone white male to speak up is
clearly bad. One of the most vocal of the council is the wife. Why is she even on the council? She has no qualifications and is only there because she's the wife of the structural engineer. Realistically there would of been people in place probably military to lead the bunker and keep order not a bunch of randoms. They have enough supplies to last only a year (great planning) but have stretched it to 5 years and are almost out. Oddly enough nobody is malnourished, they are all clean and showering with clean clothes and electricity is being wasted in every scene. They then decide to risk sending a rescue group out to a distress
beacon to bring in yet more survivors to feed and house not knowing if they may have radiation poisoning or some other illnesses therefore endangering the entire bunker. The white male is bad for opposing this but is overruled by the 'good' idiot females. At this point there has been several instances of the movie trying to explain impossible environmental plotlines away by simply saying 'for reasons we don't understand'. Can you get any lazier. The idiot kid who by the way suddenly appears to no longer be diabetic as it's never mentioned or shown even though that was the major plot device from the first movie, has been sneaking out of the bunker to go outside. How the hell is that possible, in an underground bunker with one one giant blast door entrance? Is nobody watching it? Are there no alarms if it opens?
WTF? Anyway the escape the bunker after disaster and just conveniently find an entire fleet of lifeboats washed up on shore right in front of them. Undamaged, fully functioning, fueled and with a weeks worth of food and water on board. How nice. They wash up in Liverpool with what appears to be hundreds if not thousands of perfectly fine people inhabiting it, and a fully functioning military unit as well. This unit recognizes some badge they are supposed to have to allow passage. Wait, what badges and when the hell was that a thing?
They have fully functioning vehicles and no problem with fuel. Remember, we were told the surface of the earth was burning at 900 degrees with 1000ft tsunamis after the asteroid hit. At this point I am now feeling myself getting dumber every second this is on so I'm out at 40 minutes. Where the first movie required you to turn your brain off and just watch it, this requires you to get a lobotomy first.

Score: 0

Comments (0)

Please log in to comment.

Created: 04-23-2026

Wokeness 3/5
Not Woke Very Woke
Overall 3/5
Poor Excellent

I know I've seen this before but couldn't remember it all so gave it a re-watch. It's a typical if cliché disaster movie with nothing really
original but it is entertaining enough. I would say probably a bit better made than average. The acting is pretty good and the FX are overall
pretty decent. The writing isn't great and relies on characters doing some stupid things to move the plot along. This is definitely a turn your
brain off and just watch the movie sort of film. I will say the ending is completely absurd with science and timelines thrown completely out the
window. However I have to disagree with the woke rating of the other review. There is some heavy DEI casting choices made throughout. A lot of the military seems to be female. The next door neighbors at the beginning are black/white mixed race. Then there is very obvious theme of white men bad and black and minorities good. Examples are the pharmacy scene has white males shooting and looting and the black male is nice and lets them go. The white family in the car is bad. The transport truck has the racist white bad male are good black male.
Nobody stops to pick up or check on the mom on the side of the highway except for the good Spanish family. Actually I'm pretty sure every character shown as bad is a white male and every minority shown is a good character. This is watchable particularly if you like disaster movies but there is absolutely a woke aspect to it.

Score: 1

Comments (1)

Please log in to comment.

@friedrich • 6 months ago
To be honest, I hadn't seen it that way, but now that I think about it, you might have a point there.

Created: 04-23-2026

Wokeness 0/5
Not Woke Very Woke
Overall 3/5
Poor Excellent

Much better than the comics.

Score: 0

Comments (0)

Please log in to comment.

Created: 04-22-2026

Wokeness 0/5
Not Woke Very Woke
Overall 2/5
Poor Excellent

Nothing woke in this Korean series. I like the idea here. A group of survivors needs to escape a building occupied by illegal organ harvesting organization after an earthquake partially collapses it. Every episode is done in a single take style with no cuts. The FX and sets look great and the acting is ok but again the writing and characters are just not good. There's little action with the majority of every episode consisting of characters arguing with each other and repeating the same lines over and over. Every episode drags and feels like it's twice as long as it should be. Character logic makes no sense and there is again nobody likable. For some reason they decided to have everybody constantly talking and nobody shuts up....ever. They are constantly spewing repetitive nonsense. It gets very annoying and I found myself wishing they would just shut up for 1 second. A shorter runtime like maybe a movie instead with a faster pace would of made this much better but as it stands it hard to recommend.

Score: 1

Comments (0)

Please log in to comment.

Created: 04-20-2026

Wokeness 5/5
Not Woke Very Woke
Overall 1/5
Poor Excellent

1st episode follows a group of 4 kids, 2 male 2 female. The leader is a pink shaved undercut haired girlboss who is generally unlikable and the
usual feminist type. Always angry and violent with constant bitch face who is much better than all the males. I instantly hated the character and
this is going to be the hero of the show. The male characters are all idiots and the females are smart. The very first 'villain' is a blond haired
male. The male character can't pick a lock so the tiny teenage girl kicks it open, sure. Bar scene has a tiny cowardly male arguing and standing up
to a very large other male then immediately cowers and backs down from a scrawny black purple haired female. The voice acting and animation ore pretty good but the soundtrack and music choices are out of place, terrible and distracting. I could barely make it through the first episode. All you have to do is look at screenshots of the show and you will see DEI characters and female warriors mixed in with lesbian characters kissing. Hard pass on this trash. 1 star for the animation.

Score: 1

Comments (0)

Please log in to comment.

Created: 04-20-2026

© 2022 Woke r' Not

Powered By

TMDB
Contact Us Link Tree Facebook Instagram Twitter