All User Reviews

Rise of King David with a lot of music and less violence.

This movie is a composite of some of the events in David's life, leading up to being king over Israel. The David and Goliath scene skipped the part where David beheaded Goliath with his own sword. There were more instances of violence being removed or reduced.
There was a lot of music. Too much for my preference.
I would suggest that parents watch this with their children and then discuss the Biblical account as they see fit. It's their responsibility so they should make that decision.

Fun Jason Statham action flick!

Nothing woke here! This is how action movies should be... have a hero, the bad guys coming to get him and the girl who gets caught up in the middle which he has to save now. Very little slow or dull parts and it keeps you interested the whole movie. Must watch for all Statham fans!

Not bad. Nothing exceptional.

No woke at all.
I was hoping for more trick-riding, or rodeo action. There was very little and it involved a lot of quick scene changes. The best part of this movie was the exceptionally good acting by a 12-year old. The story was Hallmark-ish. It was predictable... and cheesy. It's a good choice for a clean, family movie night.

Watchable. Nothing special

No woke. Clean. Entertaining.
Aside from being predictable, the only negative would be the issue a young child drawing violent sketches shortly after her mother died. That's kind of a heavy issue. I'm no child psychologist, but I don't think the best approach was to encourage it.
The humor was clever. The acting was surprisingly good. The CGI was exceptional.

A rom-com for the woke brain rot crowd. Story wise it's a cliché with nothing original though the acting isn't really that bad surprisingly. However the humor just isn't there. It's all eye rolling and not funny in the least. Then there is the woke garbage. The usual mixed race couple where the wife yells at the husband to stop mansplaining then smile smugly and says 'he does whatever I say'. The biggest issue however is the lead male is an annoying pathetic hipster beta douche loser who eats healthy knows nothing about sports hates confrontations and loves to exercise while the lead female is the aggressive alpha type who eats
greasy garbage hates exercise is confrontational and loves football depicting the woke gender role reversal. At one point she talks down to him and basically tells him he's an idiot and naïve to his face. She screws up and tips a guy with a $5k voucher because she thinks it's a $50 dollar one then later when she finds out she yells at him like it's his fault and says he's a thief. This is another of those movies with not one single likable character to be found anywhere. I hated everybody in this and after about 30 minutes I was done with this garbage.

Outlandish story that really happened.

The movie had the feel of trying to take a completely implausible story and make it seem possible. Except, this one is true. Yes, a 59 year old linebacker did play in Division III NCAA Football. Yes, he did compete (and win) a weightlifting contest against his 35-year junior teammates. He didn't get much playing time, but he did suit up and take the field in real games.
The acting and directing are good. There's nothing spectacular, it's just a feel-good movie based on true events.

Rom-com or Chik-flik. Funny and clever.

Zero woke.
Decent humor. Good acting and directing. It's a good "movie night with the wife." kind of flick. I enjoyed it more than I thought I would. Kim Coates (Tig - Sons of Anarchy) was a pleasant surprise.

Pro black movie, so it's what you'd expect. Has a scene with the fake black woman "FORWARD" poster on the wall

A fresh take on slice of life animes

I haven't watched something this interesting have a decade i believe, what made me turn my attention to it was the moral relativism of woke people in the internet when it comes to demons portrayed in that anime, so i watched the first episode and instantly got hooked to it.

the pacing of the story is neither slow nor fast, it just hits right in that spot, and it's interesting, this anime tries to tell that every moment in your life matters, and that you should be ready to enjoy good things in it when it happens, Frieren realizes this a little too late, so this anime shows her trying to understand relationships again.

I am watching season 2 right now and have found absolute zero woke elements, it's safe to watch, not only that but the writers and animators of this anime gave the middle finger to people trying to apply moral relativism to the demons, so i don't expect the quality to fall anytime soon.

Propaganda for anti-2A

It's been a few years since I've seen this. I'm going by memory. It was a very entertaining movie with great acting and directing. It also promotes blaming gun rights and gun manufacturers instead of the criminals who perpetrate the crimes. In short, it's left-wing propaganda. The basic premise is that the ends justify the means when it comes to tampering with a jury for the noble cause of holding gun manufacturers responsible for what criminals do.

Diversity saves the day

A lot of DEI and unrealistic outcomes in which a butch is better than most men.

Modern trad-con bastardisation

First, I find the Princess-bride narrative device of Dickens telling a story to his kids actively obnoxious. It's overdone, it disrupts the flow of the story, and the boy and cat are simply insufferable.

Speaking of, the wife is the epitome of the modern trad-con wet dream: the behind-each-great-man cliche, power-behind-the throne type, all authority with no discernible responsibility.

Feminism with a demure coat of paint.

Dickens is pictured as a bumbling idiot saved by his wife, a victim of bullying by his whole family, cat included. Actually disgraceful. And disgusting.

Facts: Dickens had a litter of kids, a superior intellect, did write a children's book about Jesus, was a pretty hard man by today's standards, and so was his (first) wife (he never remarried really, such were the times).

Also, anachronisms. From the get-go: a story of 2000 years ago. Right. Dickens was mid 19th century, people still knew how to count then.


The scriptural part of the movie lacks accuracy. Playing fast and loose with Dickens' life is one thing, but with the Good Book is less forgivable. My kids kept interrupting with "That's not how it goes in the Bible".
Historical accuracy, well, decided to sleep in that day. Lazy, shody research.

At least the minimalist rendering of the Cena, the Last Supper, was a welcome departure from the usual Da Vinci-esque extravaganza.



I wanted to like this one. But it's a lot of work.
I understand the will to appeal to the younger ones, but show them Zeffirelli's Jesus of Nazareth instead, and explain that which needs explaining.